Monsanto vs Farmer

Governments approve Monsanto’s GM cropsPercy Schmeiser and his wife Louise are third generation farmers from the prairies of Western Canada in the province of Saskatchewan near the city of Saskatoon. They feel really blessed not only that his grandparents moved there, but by the fact that in Central Saskatchewan so many types of grain crops can be grown; pulses, oil seeds, in what the locals call God’s Country.

 

The Schmeisers, like hundreds of thousands of farmers all over the world, were using their canola (oilseed rape) seed from year to year and developing new varieties suitable for climatic soil conditions on the prairies. Percy had also been the Mayor of his town for over thirty years, a member of the provincial Parliament and an active member of agricultural committees representing his province on new agricultural policy, law and regulations for the benefit of farmers.

In 1996, the Canadian Federal Government and the US Government gave regulatory approval to four genetically modified (GM) crops: soya, corn or maize, cotton and canola. At the time not all GM crops in Canada were herbicide tolerant except for Monsanto’s Roundup Ready canola and soya, both resistant to the company’s herbicide Roundup. The US Government had also approved Bt cotton and Bt corn that has the added GM toxin from Bacillus thuringenisis (Bt). The Canadian government were fully complicit in allowing Monsanto to develop GM crops on Government test plots and research stations in return for a royalty on every bushel of GM crops sold.

Monsanto versus farmer

In 1998, two years after the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Canada, the Schmeisers received a lawsuit notice from Monsanto which said that they were growing Roundup Ready canola without a licence from Monsanto and that this was a patent infringement. Monsanto had a patent on a gene to make GM canola resistant to the glyphosate herbicide in its formulation Roundup. This came as a complete surprise to the Schmeisers who immediately realised that all their research and development on canola over the past fifty years had been contaminated by Monsanto’s GMOs. They felt that they had a case against Monsanto for liability and the damages possibly caused to them, and that was the beginning of [1] Schmeiser’s Battle for the Seed (SiS 19). And 10 years on, the Schmeisers have been invited to London to tell their full story [2].

The Schmeisers stood up to Monsanto’s claims of patent infringement in the Federal Court with just one judge and no jury. The pre-trial took two years to go to court in which Monsanto claimed that despite having no knowledge of Percy Schmeiser ever having obtained any GM seed, he must have used their seed on his 1 030 acres of land because ninety-eight percent of the land was GM contaminated. And, because the Schmeisers had contaminated their own seed supply with Monsanto seed, ownership of the Schmeisers seed supply reverted to Monsanto under patent law.

Monsanto owns all crops or seeds contaminated, the court ruled

The Court ruled after a two-and-half-week trial that it was the first patent infringement case on a higher life form in the world. The Judge’s ruling and Percy Schmeiser’s name became famous overnight:

·It does not matter how a farmer, a forester, or a gardener’s seed or plants become contaminated with GMOs; whether through cross pollination, pollen blowing in the wind, by bees, direct seed movement or seed transportation, the growers no longer own their seeds or plants under patent law, they becomes Monsanto’s property.

·The rate of GM contamination does not matter; whether it’s 1 percent, 2 percent, 10 percent, or more, the seeds and plants still belong to Monsanto.

·It’s immaterial how the GM contamination occurs, or where it comes from.

The Schmeisers tracked down the source of the contamination. It was their neighbour who had planted GM crops in 1996 with no fence or buffer between them. Nevertheless, the Schmeisers’ seeds and plants reverted to Monsanto, and they were not allowed to use their own seeds and plants again, nor keep any profit from their canola crop in 1998.

The Schmeisers appealed against the ruling, and after another two years, it was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal judges even though they did not agree with all the trial judge’s statements. The Schmeisers believe that the case should have been thrown out of Court and not upheld. After having lost the two trials costing them $300 000 of their own money, Percy took the case to the Supreme Court of Canada. He was warned that there was only a very small chance that the case would be heard; but was granted a second leave of Appeal by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Schmeiser raised important questions during the Supreme Court Appeal
The Appeal was good news for the Schmeisers, but in the meantime Monsanto had brought another lawsuit against them for $1million in legal costs, fines and punitive damages. Monsanto said that the Schmeisers were recalcitrant and that they wanted a million dollars from them. For good measure, Monsanto brought a third lawsuit against the Schmeisers to seize their farmland, farm equipment and house, in an effort to stop them mortgaging their assets to pay their legal bill.

Percy Schmeiser effectively raised several important questions at the Supreme Court Appeal:

- Can living organisms, seeds, plants, genes, and human organs be owned and protected by corporate patents on intellectual property?

- Can genetically modified traits invade and become noxious weeds that then become resistant to weed killers and become superweeds? (The answer was obviously yes, as these are now all over Western Canada and almost the rest of Canada, see below.)

- Can the farmers’ rights to grow conventional or organic crops be protected, especially organic crops?

- Can farmers keep their ancient right to save their own seeds and develop them further if they so desire?

- Who owns life? Has anyone, either an individual or a corporation, the right to put a patent on a higher life form?

On the important issue of “Who owns life?” the Supreme Court ruled in 2004 that “Monsanto’s patent on a gene is valid and wherever that gene arrives in any higher life form they own or control that higher life form.” That was considered to be a major victory for Monsanto at the time, but is a decision that has come home to roost in the form of corporate liability for GMOs. Percy explained that if a corporation own and control a higher life form and they put it into the environment where everyone knows it cannot be controlled or contained and co-existence is impossible then the corporation should be liable for the damages done to an organic farmer or a conventional farmer, as well as for the negative impacts on biodiversity.

Despite strong recommendations by the Supreme Court for the Parliament of Canada to bring in new laws and regulations on patents on life and the rights of farmers to use their seed from year to year these issues have yet to be addressed to date. In the US, Monsanto has filed lawsuits against at least ninety farmers.

Monsanto’s contamination no benefit to farmers, the Supreme Court ruled

In 2004, the Supreme Court ruled that in the case of patent infringement the Schmeisers owed no money to Monsanto because they did not benefit by being contaminated by the GM genes. Furthermore, they had not used Monsanto’s patent because they had not sprayed the Roundup herbicide on their canola crops. However, both parties had to pay their own legal bills. The Schmeisers legal bill was over $400 000 and Monsanto’s was over $2 million.

In essence, Monsanto had used Percy Schmeiser as a test case to see how far they could exercise intellectual property rights (IPR) over farmers’ rights. “At one point, Monsanto had nineteen lawyers in court, I had one. Talk about intimidation,” Percy said.

No longer able to grow canola in their fields for fear of infringing Monsanto’s patent, The Schmeisers began research into yellow mustard and started cultivating 50 acres of land in preparation for planting. In the autumn of 2005, they noticed canola plants growing despite not having been seeded in those fields for many years. They brought in witnesses and tested the plants by spraying Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide on the plants. Monsanto claim that any green plant that is sprayed with Roundup that does not die must contain their patented gene. When the Schmeisers plants did not die they realised that Monsanto’s canola was in their fields again.

The Schmeisers contacted Monsanto and asked them to remove the canola plants from their property. Monsanto took samples of the plants that confirmed they were their patented variety and two days later Louise Schmeiser received a fax from Monsanto containing a signed release statement which was blackened out in parts. Louise refused to sign it and insisted that Monsanto send her the unexpurgated document. Monsanto sent what was essentially a gagging order on the Schmeisers from ever telling anyone, neighbours, and the press about the terms of settlement, or ever taking Monsanto to court again for the rest of their lives no matter how much Monsanto contaminated their fifty acre parcel of land with GM canola.

Victory for Schmeisers and farmers at last

There was no way that the Schmeisers were ever going to sign a statement like that and give up their freedom to a corporation. Monsanto said that if they refused to sign then they would not remove the plants. The argument raged backed and forth; the Schmeisers said they will remove the plants themselves and Monsanto wrote back saying we wish to remind you that the plants that are on your field are our property and you are not allowed to do with those plants what you want. The Schmeisers said get your property off our property, you’re trespassing! Monsanto said only if you sign the release form.

The Schmeisers wanted the plants off their land before the pods ripened and the seeds were dispersed into the field. They hired the neighbours to help remove the plants and notified Monsanto about what had been done and Monsanto sent another fax saying that you can’t do what you want with those plants. A bill was eventually sent to Monsanto by the Schmeisers for $640 to pay for the neighbours help to clear the field. Monsanto refused to pay the bill unless Percy signed the release statement. This went on for about a year so the Schmeisers made a decision to go back to Court amid media reports about the new dispute. The judge in the small claims Court agreed with the Schmeisers and sent Monsanto a summons. Percy said, “We then had a billion dollar Corporation in Court on a $640 bill and you can imagine the publicity that got in Canada.”

In March 2008, the case went to trial and when the judge came into the Court room Monsanto got up with a cheque in hand to pay the $640 plus $20 costs. “I’ll never forget that $20 costs!” Percy laughed. “It was a great victory, not only for ourselves, but for farmers all over the world because it has set a precedent where a corporation has accepted liability for contamination and clean up costs”, he said. Percy Schmeiser had become the first farmer in history to successfully counter-sue Monsanto for liability over damages done to his seeds and crops by Monsanto’s GM crops.

GM in Canada – lessons learnt

Thirteen years ago when GM soya and rapeseed was introduced in Canada (and in the US) the Corporations and Government told farmers that GM would increase yields, be more nutritious, use less chemicals, and feed a hungry world. Now we will always have a sustainable agriculture, they claimed. The Canadian Department of Agriculture figures states canola yields have decreased at least ten percent and soya at least fifteen percent [4], but worst of all, farmers are using three to five times more chemicals because of the GM superweeds that have developed. The reality is that the nutritional content of all crops are down fifty percent of what they were before GMOs were introduced and now we have less yields and more chemicals used, exactly the opposite of what Monsanto promised.

Percy Schmeiser said, “Once you introduce GMOs, believe me the days of organic farmers are over, the days of the conventional farmer are over, it all becomes GMOs in a matter of a few years.” In addition, he said, there is no such thing as containment, you cannot contain pollen flow. It doesn’t matter if contamination is by seeds blowing in the wind, or by bees, or by farmers transporting their seeds to market, or so on. Ultimately, farmers, growers and consumers will no longer have a choice because despite Monsanto’s promise that farmers will have choice, they won’t because it’s absolutely impossible for organic and conventional farming to co-exist with GM crops.

Mountains of contaminated produce that cannot be exported

Canadian organic farmers can no longer grow canola and soya crops organically. The seed stocks of those two crops are now totally contaminated by GMOs, which cross- pollinate into other market garden crops from the brassica family. Percy describes the devastating effect GMOs have had on Canada’s markets, as a nation reliant on exporting eighty percent of what it produces. The markets for rapeseed have shrunk to primarily exporting to Mexico, the US and Japan, Canada is now sitting on a mountain of canola, not one bushel can be exported to the EU. Furthermore, Canada’s honey markets throughout the world have been lost because of GM contamination.

Schmeiser is also concerned about a new wave of GM crops in Canada called “pharma-plants”. There are six major types of drugs now being produced by GM plants, including prescription vaccines, industrial enzymes, blood thinners, blood clotting proteins, growth hormones and contraceptives, all known to be much more dangerous than conventional drugs (see [5] Biologicals’, Wonder Drugs with Problems, SiS 42) What if somebody has had major surgery and then eats food contaminated with genes from a plant manufactured to be a blood thinner? Or what about a pregnant woman who eats food contaminated by genes from a plant that is manufactured as a contraceptive? These are just some of the worrying implications of pharma-plants, along with containment and co-existence.

Superweeds now ubiquitous in Canada, requiring supertoxic herbicides

Superweeds have evolved from conventional canola plants that have taken on the genes from three or four companies selling GM canola that has cross-pollinated and ended up in one plant. It had become established in Canada by 1996 (so quickly that horizontal gene transfer was suspected as having been involved, see [6] What Lurks Behind Triple Herbicide-Tolerant Oilseed Rape?, ISIS Report). Percy warns that superweeds are ubiquitous throughout Canada in wheat fields, barley fields, cemeteries, university grounds, towns, and golf courses. He said that all these people that never even grew GM canola have this new expense of trying to control it, and this is responsible for the massive increase in the use of chemicals to control the superweeds.

One third of Canada’s insecticides, herbicides and pesticides are used in Saskatchewan, which has the highest rate of breast cancer and prostate cancer in Canada. “We’re killing ourselves with the chemicals we are using and the chemicals are more powerful and more toxic than ever before,” Percy says. He warns that Roundup herbicide is now four times stronger than it was in 1996. Roundup is bad enough as new research reveals (see [7] Death by Multiple Poisoning, Glyphosate and Roundup, SiS 42); the new type “24D”, contains 70 percent Agent Orange, and is being used on the prairies to combat superweeds. The adverse health effect of Agent Orange in Vietnam is common knowledge and could explain the major health problems, environment damage and loss of biodiversity in Canada.

Monsanto’s culture of fear

Monsanto is perpetrating a culture of fear and intimidation in Canada in an effort to gain control of the seed supply, and ultimately the food supply. It was not easy to stand up to Monsanto. Percy said, “They tried everything to break us down mentally and financially.” His main fear was the harm that they would do to his wife and family. Monsanto employees would sit in the road in their vehicles watching us all day long when we were working in our field, he said. They would sit in the driveway for hours at a time watching Louise Schmeiser when she was working in the garden and then phone her and say “You better watch it; we’re going to get you.” Monsanto would then phone their neighbours and say if you support Percy and Louise Schmeiser we’re going to come after you and do the same to you as we’re doing to them. Monsanto offered $20 000 worth of chemicals to the Schmeisers’ neighbours if they would say something negative about them in Court.

Percy warns farmers about Monsanto’s “Inform on your neighbour” policy for a free gift such as a leather jacket or chemicals. He said when the “gene police” arrive on contaminated farm land threatening the farmer and his wife with a court case, what do you think goes through a farmers’ mind? You have a suspicion about your neighbours; it breaks down the social fabric of rural society, farmers’ relationships, farmers not trusting one another, farmers scared to talk to each other about what they are seeding. We don’t know how many thousands of farmers they have done that to. But by 2004 at least 30,000 farmers were paying royalties to Monsanto in Canada [8]. As a former politician, Percy thinks this is the worst thing that has happened with the introduction of GM crops, a whole new culture of fear that Monsanto has been able to establish on the prairies of North America and Canada.

If Monsanto can’t find the farmer at home they go to the municipality office and get the farmers address and extortion letters follow. Percy has collected a lot of letters that farmers have given to him that say: “We have reason to believe that you might be growing Monsanto’s GM rapeseed without a licence. We estimate that you have so many acres. In lieu of us not sending you to court send us $100 000 dollars or $200 000 dollars in two weeks time and we may or may not send you to court.” Can you imagine the fear of a farm family when they receive this letter from a billion dollar Corporation? The letter ends, “You’re not allowed to show this letter to anyone or we will fine you.” One farmer’s wife sent Percy a letter from Monsanto because she was at her wits end. Her husband had four heart attacks and she pleaded with them to put her in jail. Monsanto replied, “We don’t want to put you in jail lady, sell your farm and we’ll let you go for half the money.” This behaviour is ruthless and if Monsanto can victimise farmers in First World countries such as Canada and America, it is a given that they will do this in many countries all over the world.

No new GM crops for Canada

In Canada food is not labelled, and campaigners have protested to find out what’s in their food by demanding labelling. The National Farmers Union has warned farmers not to buy Monsanto’s GM seeds because of their aggressive attitude. The Government has been unsuccessful in introducing any new GM crops such as wheat, rice, flax, and alfalfa because there was such an uproar by the people who have seen the damage and don’t want any more GM crops. Schmeiser said, “If we’re trying to stop them in the US and especially Canada, why would you want to introduce them in the UK and Europe?” He believes that now the Corporations have lost the ability to introduce any more GMOs in Canada they have turned their attention to other countries in the world. He compared this dominant strategy with the sale of agricultural pesticides and chemicals that have been exported wholesale to Africa and Asia once the North American markets were saturated.

Percy said we do not know if you can ever recall out of the environment a life form that you put into it. And in relation to GMOs, what are we leaving for the future? We are at a fork in the road. If you go the GM way, this is what will happen; if you go down the other fork, you will maintain good food, safe food, and your environment. “I don’t think any of us want to leave to the future generations our environment, our soil, our water, our food, and our air full of poisons, none of us want to leave that,” he concluded. Percy has five children, fifteen grandchildren and two great grandchildren and that is why the Schmeisers have taken such a strong stand because they want to leave a legacy of safe food, water, air and soil.

[link to www.i-sis.org.uk]

GM crops will dominate and take over most of the surrounding farmland. As this happens this style of extortion from Monsanto will continue. I am hoping more farmers will fight back against this Evil chemical company who thinks they produce food.

Responses

  1. Hi, nice post. I have been thinking about this topic,so thanks for sharing. I will certainly be subscribing to your site.

    • At last the dark side of GMO is being revealed in many many places. We will rock their world before they destroy ours.

  2. The worst part of this is our Governments are have been bought by Monsanto and it is going to be almost impossible to reverse the damage that has already been done.

  3. This is an eye-opener. I always knew Monsanto was evil but they are out and out TERRORISTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. I would like to join and be kept updated. Thanks for printing this. Now … to find a way to share it on Facebook.

  5. Hi we have heard what you had to say and are fighting it here as well … thankyou on behalf of all of those who care about what they eat and a demand a right to choose.
    Bless you Percy and your family.

  6. where is the canadian government and their protection of consumers in this country ,farmers and citizens have no rights and this madness has to stop.the government,and judges decisions seem to be in favor of the big corporations who are derugulated,use their own scientific facts which have been proven to be untrue or simply mislead the public.c,mon these are the guys like monsanto who gave us agent orange,ddt that have caused so much death and destruction and now they go against mother nature in controlling what we eat.the canadian and american governments should hang their heads in shame .

  7. Thank you! I’m doing a research project on this issue. It has been very informative

    • Hi there. I have a website with heaps on info on it. http://www.declarenzge-gmfree.co.nz. If you have not seen it please take a look and sign the petition and send an E mail to the primeminister.. Hope you find it useful. hugh halliday.

  8. Greeeeeeeeat Blog Love the Infomation you have provided me .

  9. Wonderful becoming going to your web site all over again, it’s been months in my opinion. Perfectly that subject material this i have ended up patiently lay intended for so long. I would like this specific piece of writing for you to detailed this job indoors college or university, possesses exact same subject matter along with your posting. Cheers, good promote.

  10. There are many vitamins on the market, however this one really works. I’ve tried many that make you drowsy but I haven’t experienced it yet with this one. You body needs this supplement, there is no need to go without.

  11. This is a – Mix n Match | misstiktik great tip particularly to those fresh to the blogosphere. Brief but very precise info… Thanks for sharing this one. A must read post!

  12. Hi there. Perdy was in NZ a few years ago.We are all eating Monsanto foods as they are all let in by our food authority. We only have GE pines ( recently cut down again and the GE Eucalyptus that are exported to the USA. Why are we growing the? I have a website HELP DECLARE NZ GM FREE . http://www.declare nz ge-fmfree.co.nz.The national government who is trying for a trade deal with the USA will be forced to plant GE crops if it comes of. The reason you know. They (Monsanto) are the government. The qestion is ,will Monsanto trash the world becfore we stop them They want all the land contaminated so nothing else can be grown. Their mission is total control of all major foods. They are the most evil company in the world. The world is fighting back . The ninety nine percent must beat the governments and corporations. Hugh Halliday.

  13. Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is great blog. A great read. I will definitely be back.

  14. sadly, the story presented in this post is a fantasy version of reality, and its characterisations of the court rulings are incorrect. i recommend that anyone who is interested in facts, rather than self serving fabrications, should just read the judgements.

    • Thank you for sending me the Grand Disillusion. I guess you must have found my website somewhere. Please continue to send me material about GE. Hugh Halliday. http://www.declarenzge-gmfree.co.nz.

      _____

  15. [...] Source: http://thegranddisillusion.wordpress.com/monsanto-vs-farmer/ [...]

  16. monsanto roundup ready beans contaiminated 160 acres of soybeans that were ngmo soybeans that cost david webster a 77 yearold farmer when seen the problem at harvest as they tested positive for the roundup ready gene in very small number of beans we had to take sample and sort they were sold under 3 different contacts for human cosumption that both my father david webster and the buyer had to short instead the beans were sold for crusher for less money of over $15,000 when checked the field we found aprox one plant in 100 had in one pod one bean that had a darker seed spot mosanto was asked to send a rep to check the field they refused to david webster is now in court with monsanto they will stall on this david webster brussels ont canada 5198879299

  17. [...] There is a canola farmer in Canada who eventually won a lawsuit vs. Monsanto because of contamination with GMO’s. http://thegranddisillusion.wordpress.com/monsanto-vs-farmer/ [...]

  18. [...] [...]

  19. If any corporation richly deserved the corporate death penalty, it is Monsanto. In a world uncorrupted by BRIBED politicians, they would be declared public enemy number one to life on Earth.

  20. Very convenient you to leave out the facts and only include that which supports your bias, and most of it made up. He admitted to keeping seeds off plants he knew to be resistant, and replanting those. His crop was over 95% round up ready … It wasn’t a case of ‘contamination’ … he didn’t even use contamination argument. Did you even bother to read the case yourself? On the one he did sue and win, it was $660 dollars… Who is to say he didn’t plant the seed himself or it wasn’t from the previous use of the seed? I don’t blame Monsanto for agreeing to pay $660 for clean up .. He better be thankful they didn’t make him take them to court and cost him even more money!

    • Wow. I’ve read this kind of thing about Monsanto time and time again. And my family has farmed in Saskatchewan for generations. You blithely call the farmers liars and support a corporation? I compliment your loyalty as a Monsanto employee or pity your ignorance as a human being in equal measure.

      • Monsanto is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

  21. Thanks for all your efforts that you have put in this. Very interesting info. “Never knock on Death’s door ring the bell and run away Death really hates that” by Matt Frewer.

  22. It is interesting to see how often Monsanto will lie and intimidate. They are thugs.

  23. […] The Grand Disillusion   […]

  24. […] The Grand Disillusion   […]

  25. […] The Grand Disillusion   […]

  26. […] vs Farmers – The Grand Disillusion http://thegranddisillusion.wordpress.com/monsanto-vs-farmer/Companies Who Use Monsanto GE […]

  27. […] pages of their own propaganda on Google, I came across the fact that they’re a good employer. Which explains how they get people to sit on the edge of farmer’s fields and intimidate them. People are willing to do a lot for you if you treat them well. I hate invoking dictators in […]

    • The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

    • I believe they do not serve GE foods to their employers. Good for them. like Mac Donald’s who suggested that their employees should not eat their foods as they will be bad for their health and obviously therefore cost them money.

  28. Does anyone have any copies of Monsanto’s extortion letters that can be posted on the FB pages of March Against Monsanto. I would dearly like to see one.

  29. This article leaves a lot out. A lot of important stuff.

    Schmeiser didn’t plant non-Monsanto canola that spring, let it grow, and then somebody took a cutting at harvest time and found the seeds were half Monsanto DNA, as one would expect from wind-blown, accidental pollination.

    Schmeiser found Monsanto’s genetically modified “Roundup Ready Canola” plants growing near his farm. He testified that he sprayed his nearby field and found that much of the crop survived, meaning it was also Roundup Ready. He testified that he then harvested that crop, saved it separately from his other harvest, and intentionally planted it the next year. Monsanto approached him to pay a license fee for using Monsanto’s patented technology without a license. Schmeiser refused, claiming that the actual seed was his because it was grown on his land, and so Monsanto sued Schmeiser for patent infringement.

    Basically, what Schmeiser did is is analogous to two factory owners. One factory owner spends time and money inventing a new product to build and sell and patents that new product. The second factory owner buys that product at a store, takes it back to his factory and start producing copies of it with little or no investment.

    Remember, patents exist in order to help the inventor make back the time and money they put into their invention without freeloaders just copying and, essentially, getting money for nothing. But patents don’t block competition because they typically run out in 20 years from date of first filing and after that anybody can make the product, use the process, etc… without cost and, potentially, produce a better/cheaper product than the original inventor.

    Before you claim that Monsanto GMOs are evil, get your facts straight and realize that Monsanto did what every other patent holder in every other industry from electronics to car parts to plumbing fixtures and beyond do evey day of the week while defending they time and money they put into developing new products & technologies.

    • Logically speaking, how can you “patent” something that you can’t control? Planting is a process in which nature will take its own course, in this case by spreading the contaminated seeds that have been tampered with. This “inventor” is irresponsible and near sighted, and chooses to make his immediate economic goals of greater importance than long-term economic and ecological goals. It’s called greed and you are as guilty as he is. Greed ignores future consequences. You may have a job now but future generations may not because Europe, NZ,Australia and others will not buy Canada’s GMO. It’s quite apparent why US and Canadian governments haven’t banned GMO. They need us to consume their mistakes which we can’t sell to other countries. Should Canadians thank you for that? I suggest you rethink.

  30. […] else’s fault. Read about a family whose crops were contaminated with Monsanto’s Canola here. Monsanto sued them, and won, because they have patented their crops. The law states that the […]

  31. […] The patent on the seeds makes it so that when they cross pollinate with crops in fields around them, the farmer who did not […]

  32. Monsanto’s patented seeds are trespassing on to neighboring properties and trespassing onto private property is illegal unless you give permission. If conventional and organic farmers could protect their land from Monsanto’s seeds I’m sure they would, but it seems only right that Monsanto and farmers who buy GM seed should be the one’s who to ensure they are not spreading their seed.

  33. If they can legally patent them then they must be different to normal hybridized seeds. They say they are the same. Contradictory. Since they and Glyphosate is causing increasing illness ,cancer, birth defects, killing birds, bees and amphibians and making animals sick and it seems humans too. They must be stopped. They are jumping on the wagon of state control and world control. Read the book by Ian Wishart Totalitaria which puts it all together. Any American can see how freedom is being slowly squashed. how foods, medicines and chemicals are killing us etc. Wake up. .

  34. Monsanto, the Corporation from Hell, with the resources to corrupt governments, courts, and agencies worldwide, and in Canada, to force the firing of bribery whistleblowers.

  35. […] Monsanto vs Farmer | The Grand Disillusion […]

  36. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  37. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  38. […] sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  39. […] sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  40. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  41. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  42. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  43. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  44. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  45. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  46. […] farmers has sued Monsanto over GMO seed contamination of their non-GMO crops, and Monsanto has sued farmers over saving seed, a practice that has been going on since the dawn of agriculture, more than several thousand […]

  47. This is an incredibly twisted and flat-out fictional version of this story.

    The actual truth is that the farmer is hardly as innocent as he’s been made out to be. He didn’t just accidentally grow GMO crops; he intentionally tested his crops to find the invasive seed, harvested it, stored it, and cultivated it the next year, separate from his regular crops.

    Wikipedia has the details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_Canada_Inc._v._Schmeiser

    The summary: “The court heard the question of whether Schmeiser’s intentionally growing genetically modified plants constituted “use” of Monsanto’s patented genetically modified plant cells. By a 5-4 majority, the court ruled that it did. The case drew worldwide attention and is widely misunderstood to concern what happens when farmers’ fields are accidentally contaminated with patented seed. However by the time the case went to trial, all claims had been dropped that related to patented seed in the field that was contaminated in 1997; the court only considered the GM canola in Schmeiser’s 1998 fields, which Schmeiser had intentionally concentrated and planted from his 1997 harvest. Regarding his 1998 crop, Schmeiser did not put forward any defence of accidental contamination.”

    If you have a problem with this, your problem should be with the IP laws that allow people to patent genes in the first place, not the company that did something totally legal and protected its IP rights against someone who willfully violated them.

  48. Well I’m sorry but people doing this kind of behavior..poisoning, promoting, extorting, threatening, contaminating..stealing lives…so much sinister garbage. my fruit orchard would be mighty and strong from those directly responsible. The legal system is not scientific and archaic as the Romans imperialism. My resolve would be to treat them as Nazi’s and the like.

  49. And you tell the story pro monsanto types. Did he know the pesticide resistant strains were an engineered patented strain? I doubt it. Selected because it had those attributes, it’s not relevant that he planted it on purpose under those circumstances.

  50. Farmers need to give away the crop equally amongst each other voiding agreement with Monsanto enabling to keep seeds now for future I bought Monsanto seeds

  51. Give away crop to other farmers voiding contract with Monsanto seed policy. If done equally amongst farmers legally on paper notarized sometimes you have to give it away to beat the system.

  52. Since my last comment in 2011, my website has grown with all the latest information from the world and also lots of videos and a few blogs. It is all around the world and with all the other pressure groups great strides are being made to stop this evil .The main problem are Western Governments who are bought politically by the chemical companies and backed by the one world government to reduce the population and make us sick. Hugh Halliday. http://www.declarenzge-gmfree.co.nz.

  53. […] fault. Read about a family whose crops were contaminated with Monsanto’s Canola here. Monsanto sued them, and won, because they have patented their crops. The law states that the […]

  54. Monsanto was started by the Rockefellers with the intention to take over the world’s food supply. It doesn’t matter how much money they have or even if they think they run the world and are above the law. If you want them out of business do not buy any product the Rockfellers are involved in and start by trying to bankrupt the Rockfellers. After that start on the next person who is corrupting USA. I don’t care how much money you have, there is still a way to bring you down and it doesn’t have to be in cout. Vote with your dollar. My dollat says I will never give one to any of those crooks.

  55. I wonder if the Rockfellers and the Rothschilds or even the Queen of England eat the GMo’s. If not, they should be forced to eat them every day at every meal. We’ll find out the truth that way. Like send them some cookies made of GMO or corn or bread-with plenty of round up on them. they created this mess, they should all be willing to eat the stuff, but my guess is they don’t and they won’t ever.

  56. Adiphene will deal with your weight loss in 5 other ways , which means you’re going to lose extra weight, and you’re going to lose it much sooner than you’ll with dieting
    and exercise alone. This alone offers it some credit score as
    a authentic contender within the eating regimen complement arena;
    at the moment oversaturated with poor high quality diet
    products. Uptil now no individual has actually been captured with
    any negative effects.

  57. future, the researchers want to find out whether a combination of several educated in the gastrointestinal tract hormones can further enhance the effect of the gastric
    band. Safety is also assured when taking Adiphene because
    of its natural ingredients, which means that serious side effects are unlikely to happen if taken as directed.
    Having said that, the study has shown that just about anything that can maximize the metabolism,
    also can raise the weight reduction even if the human being is just resting.

  58. The wind bring your patented pollen to my field. Why not suing the wind? Or even “suing God” for making wind?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: