Posted by: Disillusioned | October 18, 2009

Lord Christopher Monckton Warns US

Lord Christopher Monckton, who was science advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, warned the US on October 14th, that President Obama will sign a treaty in early December that deals with Global Warming.  This treaty contains some verbiage in it that threaten US sovereignty and makes the US pay third world countries for us releasing C02 in the atmosphere.  Lord Christopher Monckton believes there is no global warming crisis and the treaty is more about World Government than it is anything else.  Please watch the video.  He is very credible and this situation is quite disturbing.

Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:

Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.

I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough)  a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.

Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I –

I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.

I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama’s potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?

I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.

Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.

Skimming through the treaty, the author of this article came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:

38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:

World Government (heading added)

(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)

b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the “climate debt” Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.

With Enforcement Authority (heading added)

© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].

Here is a copy of that treaty:  http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/16/obama-poised-to-cede-us-sovereignty-in-copenhagen-claims-british-lord-monckton/

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Check your facts. I find nowhere on the Internet that our “valid”(your term) energetic, intelligent, hardworking president plans on signing the treaty in Copenhagen. In fact, right up to today, the valid news sources say otherwise. There are numerous sources from both camps, but the alarmists who are predicting doom for our country do not seem to have the facts to back up their claims. Is the dissemination of this claim simply for our entertainment?

    • This was posted 3 hours ago:

      Gore ‘certain’ Obama will attend climate talks
      (AFP) – 3 hours ago

      http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jnbhzri8g1bulqAk9OQ5eD2A6Z-Q

      Be aware and educate yourself on what is going on. Hint: you will not get all of the information you need from the mainstream news – it might or might not be complete, it will almost certainly be biased, and you can’t depend on the mainstream media to report all relevant information – too many things get covered up – mostly for money or power.

      Lord Monkton gave us a warning – and right now that is all it is. There will be no facts available on whether Obama signs it or not until after the Copenhagen talks.

  2. Actually, I think this video of Lord Monkton was an awesome find. I don’t know if this is considered mainstream news or not, but I just saw him on Fox news the other night. And by giving us a link to the actual treaty, I was able to confirm everything he said about it. It’s all in there. I would much rather know this is happening now than to hear about it after the fact. I agree – it is scary, and we can’t just assume it won’t be signed. This ‘energetic’ president of ours has been full of surprises and certainly doesn’t have MY best interest at heart. Thanks for this, and keep it up!!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: